HUDSON V. WALSH AND ANOTHER

HUDSON V. WALSH AND ANOTHER

The defendant's negligence, by driving at a grossly excessive speed despite hazardous road conditions and the obvious presence of an impediment, was the sole cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The plaintiff did not fail to take reasonable care for his own safety and was not contributorily negligent.

Parties
Plaintiff: Walsh; Defendant: Alderman; Defendant: (unnamed second defendant)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 September 1961
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Negligence, Damages, Contributory Negligence
Torts Personal Injury Negligence Damages Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walsh

Plaintiff

Alderman

Defendant

(unnamed second defendant)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was negligent and caused the plaintiff's injuries
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence
  3. 3 Quantum of damages to be awarded

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's negligence, by driving at a grossly excessive speed despite hazardous road conditions and the obvious presence of an impediment, was the sole cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The plaintiff did not fail to take reasonable care for his own safety and was not contributorily negligent.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff for £10,551 8s 6d with costs