Walshah Pty Limited v Nando's Australia Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 112
The plaintiff corporation failed to show ability to meet an adverse costs order and did not contest evidence of impecuniosity; given substantial anticipated costs and the evidence, there is a real risk plaintiff will not pay defendants’ costs if unsuccessful, justifying a security for costs order in the sum of $360,000.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Application; Decision on Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered against the plaintiff; proceedings stayed if not provided within 14 days; costs of motion to defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'corporate Insolvency' 'discretionary Orders' 'franchise Agreements' 'costs Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Application; Decision on Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether jurisdictional condition justifying order for security for costs is met under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335(1) and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005' 'Whether a security for costs order should be made for the defendants against the plaintiff' 'Quantum of security for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff corporation failed to show ability to meet an adverse costs order and did not contest evidence of impecuniosity; given substantial anticipated costs and the evidence, there is a real risk plaintiff will not pay defendants’ costs if unsuccessful, justifying a security for costs order in the sum of $360,000.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered against the plaintiff; proceedings stayed if not provided within 14 days; costs of motion to defendants.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff is to provide security for the defendants' costs up to and including the amount of $360,000, in a form acceptable to the Registrar." 'In the event that the plaintiff does not provide such security within 14 days of this order, the proceedings on the statement of claim are to be stayed until such...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment