Forsyth v Perpetual Trustee Co (Ltd) [1951] HCA 74
Clause 2 imposed an imperative duty to transfer the trust fund to William upon his attaining fifty-five years if he had not become disentitled. William attained that age without disentitlement, so his right to the absolute transfer had accrued and his interest vested absolutely and indefeasibly. In context, the words in clause 5 "without having received the absolute transfer" meant without having become entitled de jure to that transfer, not without actual physical transfer of the investments. Clause 5 therefore did not divest William's interest, and the trust fund was held for his executors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning the Construction of an Indenture of Settlement / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decretal Order of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Its Equitable Jurisdiction on an Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Trust Deed' 'protective Trusts' 'vesting and Defeasance of Beneficial Interests' 'meaning of "received" in Trust Dispositions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning the Construction of an Indenture of Settlement / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decretal Order of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Its Equitable Jurisdiction on an Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether clause 5 of the indenture applied because William Edgar Forsyth died after attaining fifty-five years but before the trust fund was actually transferred to him.' 'Whether the words "without having received the absolute transfer of the trust fund as hereinbefore provided" meant without actual receipt of the trust fund or without becoming entitled de jure to receive it.' 'Whether the trust fund was held for the executors of William Edgar Forsyth or for his surviving sisters and brother.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2 imposed an imperative duty to transfer the trust fund to William upon his attaining fifty-five years if he had not become disentitled. William attained that age without disentitlement, so his right to the absolute transfer had accrued and his interest vested absolutely and indefeasibly. In context, the words in clause 5 "without having received the absolute transfer" meant without having become entitled de jure to that transfer, not without actual physical transfer of the investments. Clause 5 therefore did not divest William's interest, and the trust fund was held for his executors.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment