Doolan, B.J. v Waltons Ltd [1982] FCA 89

Doolan, B.J. v Waltons Ltd [1982] FCA 89

Waltons Limited falsely represented the quality and composition of goods by advertising the Cambridge Collection of tables as 'solid timber with an oak finish' when they were composed substantially of particleboard and medium density fibreboard, not natural timber. Ignorance of the ordinary meaning of 'solid timber' and reliance on the wholesaler's information were not reasonable defences within the meaning of s.85(1)(a) or (b) of the Act, thus conviction for both offences was appropriate.

Parties
Prosecutor: Barry John Doolan; Defendant: Waltons Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 1982
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Final Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and fine
Legal Topics
False or Misleading Representations, Quality and Composition of Goods
Trade Practices False or Misleading Representations Quality and Composition of Goods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barry John Doolan

Prosecutor

Waltons Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Final Judgment and Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Waltons Limited falsely represented the quality or composition of goods by advertising tables as 'solid timber with an oak finish' contrary to s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
  2. 2 Meaning of 'solid timber' to members of the public
  3. 3 Whether the false representation resulted from reasonable reliance on information supplied by another person under s.85(1)(b)

Ratio Decidendi

Waltons Limited falsely represented the quality and composition of goods by advertising the Cambridge Collection of tables as 'solid timber with an oak finish' when they were composed substantially of particleboard and medium density fibreboard, not natural timber. Ignorance of the ordinary meaning of 'solid timber' and reliance on the wholesaler's information were not reasonable defences within the meaning of s.85(1)(a) or (b) of the Act, thus conviction for both offences was appropriate.

Court Disposition

conviction and fine

Orders

  • Waltons Limited is convicted of committing two contraventions of s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
  • Waltons Limited is ordered to pay a fine of $750 in respect of the offence on 8 February 1981 and $750 in respect of the offence on 22 February 1981.