QUAGLIATO v LAPINSKI [1997] NSWCA 255
Although the appellant and deceased were not particularly close after the grandmother's death, the appellant's upbringing and the deceased's responsibility for her place her in the position of a child for family provision purposes. The appellant’s financial position warranted a small provision, subject to the size of the estate.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wanda Quagliato; Respondent: Ms Lapinski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Family Provision, Testator's Family Maintenance, Grandchild Claims, Discretion of the Court, Adequacy of Provision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wanda Quagliato
Appellant
Ms Lapinski
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant, as a granddaughter raised by the deceased, was entitled to family provision from the estate
- 2 Whether the Master's order dismissing the application should stand or be set aside
- 3 Quantum of provision (if any) that should be made for the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Although the appellant and deceased were not particularly close after the grandmother's death, the appellant's upbringing and the deceased's responsibility for her place her in the position of a child for family provision purposes. The appellant’s financial position warranted a small provision, subject to the size of the estate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order below set aside
- In lieu thereof a legacy be granted to the appellant in the sum of $10,000 with no interest if paid within 28 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment