Cruse v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union (No 2) [2008] FCA 1637
A penalty of $4,000 was imposed on the Union for vicarious breach of s 170NC due to significant breach of coercion in enterprise bargaining, while no monetary penalty was imposed for breaches of s 298SC given unusual circumstances, lack of prior contraventions, and evidence of educative effect; declarations sufficed for some breaches by the shop steward.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Law Proceedings / Penalty and Order Determination Following Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Penalty imposed on Union for vicarious breach; declarations made; proceeding otherwise dismissed; matter adjourned for costs determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['freedom of Association' 'enterprise Bargaining Agreements' 'union Vicarious Liability' 'penalties for Statutory Breaches']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Proceedings / Penalty and Order Determination Following Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether penalties should be imposed for breaches of ss 170NC and 298SC of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)' 'Appropriate level of penalties' 'Vicarious liability of the Union for acts of its shop steward']
Ratio Decidendi
A penalty of $4,000 was imposed on the Union for vicarious breach of s 170NC due to significant breach of coercion in enterprise bargaining, while no monetary penalty was imposed for breaches of s 298SC given unusual circumstances, lack of prior contraventions, and evidence of educative effect; declarations sufficed for some breaches by the shop steward.
Court Disposition
Penalty imposed on Union for vicarious breach; declarations made; proceeding otherwise dismissed; matter adjourned for costs determination.
Orders
- ['A penalty of $4,000 is imposed on the First Respondent for breach of s 170NC of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), to be paid into Consolidated Revenue within 21 days.' "It is declared that the First Respondent breached s 298SC of the WR Act as a result of the Fourth Respondent making a false or misleading...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment