Wilton v Hunters Hill Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 246
The amended development proposal, after negotiated changes and considering expert advice and submissions by the remaining objector, has minimal adverse impact, warrants upholding the appeal and SEPP 1 objection, and should be approved subject to the attached and amended conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment After Hearing and Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions by consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'appeal' 'consent Orders' "objector's Participation" 'sepp 1 Objection' 'heritage Conservation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment After Hearing and Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposed alterations and additions at 18 Edgecliff Road should be approved' 'Appropriateness of upholding SEPP 1 objection' "Consideration of objector's concerns regarding view, shadow, privacy and heritage impacts"]
Ratio Decidendi
The amended development proposal, after negotiated changes and considering expert advice and submissions by the remaining objector, has minimal adverse impact, warrants upholding the appeal and SEPP 1 objection, and should be approved subject to the attached and amended conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions by consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal be upheld.' 'Development Application No.1076/2000 for alterations and additions including a new second storey at 18 Edgecliff Road, Hunters Hill is approved subject to annexure A conditions as amended.' 'The SEPP1 objection contained in Exhibit W5 is upheld.' 'Each party is to bear its own costs.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment