New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy Airlines and Utilities Union v Warringah Council [2015] NSWIRComm 1012
The application for an award does not satisfy the Special Case Principle, as the conditions sought do not reflect special or out-of-the-ordinary circumstances and the existing underpinning award is fair and reasonable. The award application is therefore refused, but orders are appropriate in the industrial dispute to preserve certain aspects of the status quo for a defined period to provide fairness and certainty to employees.
- Parties
- Notifier and Applicant: New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy Airlines and Utilities Union; Respondent: Warringah Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Award in Industrial Dispute / Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Award application refused. Orders made in the industrial dispute to preserve the new roster and salary projections for twelve months.
- Legal Topics
- Application for Award, Enterprise Agreement Termination, Special Case Principle, Industrial Dispute, Roster Changes, Employee Entitlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy Airlines and Utilities Union
Notifier and Applicant
Warringah Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Award in Industrial Dispute / Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an award should be made replacing the enterprise agreement under the Special Case Principle
- 2 Whether the circumstances justify an award to preserve prior employment conditions
- 3 What orders should be made to resolve the industrial dispute after the enterprise agreement's termination
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an award does not satisfy the Special Case Principle, as the conditions sought do not reflect special or out-of-the-ordinary circumstances and the existing underpinning award is fair and reasonable. The award application is therefore refused, but orders are appropriate in the industrial dispute to preserve certain aspects of the status quo for a defined period to provide fairness and certainty to employees.
Court Disposition
Award application refused. Orders made in the industrial dispute to preserve the new roster and salary projections for twelve months.
Orders
- The new roster is to commence from the first full pay period 21 days from the date of this decision.
- The roster is to be used without variation for twelve months from commencement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment