Warringah Development Pty Limited v Warringah Council [2016] NSWLEC 1251
An agreement between the parties was reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied the decision was one the Court could have made. Therefore, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement, and no merit assessment of the original disputed issues was required.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties have reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings' 'Whether the decision is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement between the parties was reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied the decision was one the Court could have made. Therefore, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement, and no merit assessment of the original disputed issues was required.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the plans set out in operational condition 1 to annexure "A".' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to s97B as may be agreed or assessed." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment