Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning [1947] HCA 21
The Commission acted within its statutory discretion in refusing consent to the transfer of the lease to Carbone, considering matters relevant to the administration and development of the irrigation area, including policy concerning naturalized persons of enemy origin. The discretion conferred on the Commission is...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (N.S.W.); Respondent: Eric Browning; Proposed Transferee: Antonio Carbone
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order of Supreme Court set aside. Rule nisi for mandamus discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Discretionary Powers of Statutory Authorities, Mandamus, Transfer of Leases, Naturalization and Aliens
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (N.S.W.)
Appellant
Eric Browning
Respondent
Antonio Carbone
Proposed Transferee
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission's refusal to consent to the transfer of an irrigation-farm lease to a naturalized person of enemy origin a valid exercise of its statutory discretion?
- 2 Did the Commission consider the application according to law, or did it rely on irrelevant or extraneous considerations?
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission acted within its statutory discretion in refusing consent to the transfer of the lease to Carbone, considering matters relevant to the administration and development of the irrigation area, including policy concerning naturalized persons of enemy origin. The discretion conferred on the Commission is wide and undefined, and the reasons relied upon were not shown to be extraneous or irrelevant to the statutory purpose. The Commission did consider the application on its merits, and absence of bad faith or arbitrariness means the court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the Commission.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order of Supreme Court set aside. Rule nisi for mandamus discharged.
Orders
- Rule nisi for mandamus discharged.
- Appellant (Commission) to pay respondent's (Browning) costs of appeal to the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment