WATERS v P C HENDERSON (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD [1994] NSWCA 338
No error was demonstrated in the trial judge’s discretionary award of interest or costs. The principle that interest compensates for not having timely payment was correctly applied, and discretion as to costs should not be interfered with absent clear error of principle, especially in complex commercial matters where issue-by-issue costs allocation is typically impractical.
- Parties
- Appellant: WATERS; Respondent: P C HENDERSON (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Judgment Debt, Costs Discretion, Reference to Referee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WATERS
Appellant
P C HENDERSON (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in awarding interest to the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in the exercise of discretion as to costs, specifically by not allocating costs by particular issues won or lost.
Ratio Decidendi
No error was demonstrated in the trial judge’s discretionary award of interest or costs. The principle that interest compensates for not having timely payment was correctly applied, and discretion as to costs should not be interfered with absent clear error of principle, especially in complex commercial matters where issue-by-issue costs allocation is typically impractical.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- appellant must pay the respondent's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment