WATERSON v BATTEN [1988] NSWCA 169

WATERSON v BATTEN [1988] NSWCA 169

By majority, the Court held that the trial judge's reasons were sufficiently elaborate and satisfactory for the issues presented; he was not required to resolve peripheral factual conflicts or to expound at length where the decision turned on credibility, and no error in law or reasoning was established warranting a new trial.

Parties
Appellant: Waterson; Respondent: Batten
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 May 1988
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination After Trial at First Instance
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Duty to Give Reasons, Motor Vehicle Accident, Standard of Appellate Review
Civil Procedure Torts Duty to Give Reasons Motor Vehicle Accident Standard of Appellate Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Waterson

Appellant

Batten

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination After Trial at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to give adequate reasons for the decision
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge misapplied the burden of proof as to police honesty
  3. 3 Whether failure to resolve evidentiary conflicts amounted to legal error

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court held that the trial judge's reasons were sufficiently elaborate and satisfactory for the issues presented; he was not required to resolve peripheral factual conflicts or to expound at length where the decision turned on credibility, and no error in law or reasoning was established warranting a new trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant to pay costs of the appeal