Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 336
The application for adjournment was refused because the appellants had ample opportunity to comply with procedural requirements: written submissions were due long ago, requests for legal advice had already been accommodated, and the amendment to the notice of appeal was sought too late.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Elena Bobolas; Second Applicant: Liana Bobolas; Third Applicant: Mary Bobolas; Respondent: Waverley Council; Amicus: SAC Patterson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Decision on Adjournment
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused.
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Appeal, Filing of Written Submissions, Legal Representation, Amendment of Notice of Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elena Bobolas
First Applicant
Liana Bobolas
Second Applicant
Mary Bobolas
Third Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
SAC Patterson
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Decision on Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal hearing should be adjourned to allow appellants to file written submissions, obtain legal advice, or amend their notice of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for adjournment was refused because the appellants had ample opportunity to comply with procedural requirements: written submissions were due long ago, requests for legal advice had already been accommodated, and the amendment to the notice of appeal was sought too late.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused.
Orders
- Application for adjournment is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment