Waverley Council v Mary Bobolas [2017] NSWLEC 112
It is procedurally proper and permissible, under Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 64, for the Court to allow amendment of a Notice of Motion charging contempt so as to charge each respondent individually by name. The respondents were afforded ample opportunity to object or take points regarding service and amendment but failed to do so; thus the objection to the Amended Notice of Motion must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (contempt Proceedings) / Interlocutory; Ruling on Objection to Amended Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Objection to Amended Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'contempt of Court' 'enforcement Proceedings' 'notice of Motion Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (contempt Proceedings) / Interlocutory; Ruling on Objection to Amended Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether amendment of the Notice of Motion to individually name each respondent in a contempt charge is permissible' 'Whether any defect existed in amendment procedure or service with respect to Amended Notice of Motion' 'Whether respondents were prejudiced by the amendment']
Ratio Decidendi
It is procedurally proper and permissible, under Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 64, for the Court to allow amendment of a Notice of Motion charging contempt so as to charge each respondent individually by name. The respondents were afforded ample opportunity to object or take points regarding service and amendment but failed to do so; thus the objection to the Amended Notice of Motion must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Objection to Amended Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- ['Complaint against the Amended Notice of Motion is dismissed' "Council's Amended Notice of Motion to proceed against each respondent individually"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment