Bobolas v Waverley Council [2022] NSWLEC 35
Because the Applicants' summons in Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 3) [2021] NSWLEC 63 was dismissed and the Applicants were unsuccessful on their claims, the usual Class 4 rule that costs follow the event applied. The later practical fact that the Applicants completed the clean-up and the Council did not enter the premises did not arise from the determination of the legal issues and was not relevant to costs. The Applicants identified no basis for varying the usual costs order, so Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas were ordered to pay the Council's costs as agreed or assessed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Costs Application / Notice of Motion Dated 21 June 2021 by the Respondent Council Seeking Costs After the Applicants' Summons Was Dismissed
- Outcome
- Costs ordered for the Respondent Council against Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Follow the Event' 'discretion to Award Costs' 'local Government Act Waste Removal Order' 'entry Onto Premises to Carry Out Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Costs Application / Notice of Motion Dated 21 June 2021 by the Respondent Council Seeking Costs After the Applicants' Summons Was Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Respondent Council should recover its costs after dismissal of the Applicants' summons" 'Whether the Applicants identified any disentitling conduct or other basis to depart from the usual costs order' 'Whether any costs order should be made against Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Applicants' summons in Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 3) [2021] NSWLEC 63 was dismissed and the Applicants were unsuccessful on their claims, the usual Class 4 rule that costs follow the event applied. The later practical fact that the Applicants completed the clean-up and the Council did not enter the premises did not arise from the determination of the legal issues and was not relevant to costs. The Applicants identified no basis for varying the usual costs order, so Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas were ordered to pay the Council's costs as agreed or assessed.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered for the Respondent Council against Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas.
Orders
- ['Ms Elena Bobolas and Mrs Mary Bobolas must pay the costs of the Respondent Council in the proceedings, as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment