Attard v Waverley Council [2023] NSWLEC 1610
The written request to vary the FSR is justified; strict compliance is both unreasonable and unnecessary, as the variation will not perceptibly impact amenity or streetscape. The amended application satisfies all jurisdictional requirements and relevant planning controls, warranting the grant of consent.
- Parties
- First Applicant: George Attard; Second Applicant: Liana Attard; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Floor Space Ratio, Variation of Development Standard, Conciliation, Consent Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Attard
First Applicant
Liana Attard
Second Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the variation of the floor space ratio development standard under clause 4.6 of the Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 should be permitted
- 2 Whether consent should be granted for the demolition and construction of a dwelling, garage, swimming pool, and terrace
Ratio Decidendi
The written request to vary the FSR is justified; strict compliance is both unreasonable and unnecessary, as the variation will not perceptibly impact amenity or streetscape. The amended application satisfies all jurisdictional requirements and relevant planning controls, warranting the grant of consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- The Applicant's written request to vary the floor space ratio development standard in clause 4.4 of the Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 is upheld.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment