Bobolas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 131

Bobolas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 131

The application to set aside the orders of Ward JA was dismissed because the applicants failed to establish any reviewable error as required by s 46(4) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), nor any irregularity, illegality, or lack of good faith under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules. The original orders regarding service, procedural fairness, public health risk, and entry/power under s 678 were all properly addressed and justified.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Set Aside Orders of Ward Ja, Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Applications' 'stay of Execution' "review of Appellate Judge's Order" 'public Health and Safety' 'cost Orders']
['civil Procedure'] ['interlocutory Applications' 'stay of Execution' "review of Appellate Judge's Order" 'public Health and Safety' 'cost Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application to Set Aside Orders of Ward Ja, Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the orders of Ward JA refusing a stay of execution and discharging previous orders should be set aside under s 46(4) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)' 'Whether there was any reviewable error, irregularity, illegality, or want of good faith in the orders' 'Whether the requirements of service and procedural fairness were met']

Ratio Decidendi

The application to set aside the orders of Ward JA was dismissed because the applicants failed to establish any reviewable error as required by s 46(4) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), nor any irregularity, illegality, or lack of good faith under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules. The original orders regarding service, procedural fairness, public health risk, and entry/power under s 678 were all properly addressed and justified.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order that the application made by the applicants by notice of motion filed on 9 April 2014 seeking to set aside the orders of Ward JA be dismissed.' "Order that the applicants pay the respondent's costs of the application."]