Benson v Tattersall Lander Pty Ltd [2018] NSWLEC 121
The development consent was invalid because the Council failed to consider mandatory matters relevant to s 79C EPA Act, particularly impacts of chicken farming (odour, traffic, environmental) and failed to properly follow required procedures under s 372 Local Government Act 1993 when altering resolutions. The consent cannot stand.
- Parties
- Applicant: Wayne Benson; First Respondent: Tattersall Lander Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Wollondilly Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Development consent declared invalid and of no effect
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Judicial Review, Mandatory Considerations, Procedural Invalidity, Unreasonableness, Uncertainty of Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wayne Benson
Applicant
Tattersall Lander Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Wollondilly Shire Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wollondilly Shire Council failed to consider mandatory relevant matters under s 79C Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 when issuing development consent
- 2 Whether Council's decision to permit farming of chickens (in addition to turkeys) was manifestly unreasonable or without plausible justification
- 3 Whether the consent is invalid for uncertainty
Ratio Decidendi
The development consent was invalid because the Council failed to consider mandatory matters relevant to s 79C EPA Act, particularly impacts of chicken farming (odour, traffic, environmental) and failed to properly follow required procedures under s 372 Local Government Act 1993 when altering resolutions. The consent cannot stand.
Court Disposition
Development consent declared invalid and of no effect
Orders
- The Court declares that any development consent purportedly granted by Wollondilly Shire Council to DA 010.2015.00000316.001, in October/November 2016, for the extension of existing poultry sheds 4, 5 and 6 and construction of two additional sheds, is invalid and of no effect.
- The First Respondent is restrained from carrying out development in accordance with any such purported Consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment