Baker v Chief of Army [2017] ADFDAT 3
None of the defences or justifications advanced—pertaining to military context, justification under other laws, sudden or extraordinary emergency, or self-defence—were available to the appellant on the facts and law; the findings of guilt by the Defence Force Magistrate were supported by the evidence, and the appeal must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wayne Donald Baker; Respondent: Chief of Army
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; extension of time and leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Defence Force Discipline, Criminal Responsibility, Justification and Excuse, Sudden or Extraordinary Emergency, Self Defence, Military Context in Criminal Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wayne Donald Baker
Appellant
Chief of Army
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defence Force Magistrate failed to consider the military context of the offending
- 2 Whether findings of guilt were against the weight of the evidence
- 3 Correct construction of s 10.5 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code on justification or excuse by 'a law'
Ratio Decidendi
None of the defences or justifications advanced—pertaining to military context, justification under other laws, sudden or extraordinary emergency, or self-defence—were available to the appellant on the facts and law; the findings of guilt by the Defence Force Magistrate were supported by the evidence, and the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; extension of time and leave to appeal granted
Orders
- The period within which the appeal and application for leave to appeal must be lodged be extended to the date on which it was lodged.
- Leave to appeal, to the extent necessary, be granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment