Doyle, Wayne v Prices Removal & Storage Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 697
The proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause because the applicant commenced it without making any attempt to check the reliability of the particulars, which were prepared from material he supplied, advanced a claim on an unsupported basis that he was a casual employee throughout the relevant period, and contained extensive unreliable entries such that it was not reasonable to require the respondent or the Judicial Registrar to identify any isolated legitimate claims. The applicant had to take responsibility for the claim advanced on his behalf, and no evidence justified a contrary inference from the log book issue.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Decision of Judicial Registrar Ryan in a Workplace Relations Act 1996 (cth) Wage Arrears Proceeding / Hearing De Novo on the Transcript of Evidence Before the Judicial Registrar
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion, including reserved costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['arrears of Wages' 'costs in Proceedings Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (cth)' 'proceedings Instituted Without Reasonable Cause' 'review of Judicial Registrar Decision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Decision of Judicial Registrar Ryan in a Workplace Relations Act 1996 (cth) Wage Arrears Proceeding / Hearing De Novo on the Transcript of Evidence Before the Judicial Registrar
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause within s 347 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)." "Whether the applicant should pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding before the Judicial Registrar and of the review application."]
Ratio Decidendi
The proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause because the applicant commenced it without making any attempt to check the reliability of the particulars, which were prepared from material he supplied, advanced a claim on an unsupported basis that he was a casual employee throughout the relevant period, and contained extensive unreliable entries such that it was not reasonable to require the respondent or the Judicial Registrar to identify any isolated legitimate claims. The applicant had to take responsibility for the claim advanced on his behalf, and no evidence justified a contrary inference from the log book issue.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion, including reserved costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion, including reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment