Stone & Drabsch v Pinniger [2011] NSWSC 795
The informal document was not expressed as a testamentary instrument; it confirmed the will and communicated wishes about trust property which the testator knew was not subject to disposition by will. The evidence did not establish the testator intended this document to have testamentary effect or to alter/revoke the will. Section 8 of the Succession Act did not apply and probate was granted on the will alone.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Succession / Judgment After Hearing of Amended Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Cross-claim dismissed; probate granted to plaintiffs in solemn form of the 2 May 2008 will.
- Legal Topics
- ['informal Testamentary Documents' 'alteration or Revocation of Wills' 'testamentary Intention' 'section 8 Succession Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate / Succession / Judgment After Hearing of Amended Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an informal document purported to state the testamentary intention of the deceased and operates as an alteration or partial revocation of the will under section 8 Succession Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
The informal document was not expressed as a testamentary instrument; it confirmed the will and communicated wishes about trust property which the testator knew was not subject to disposition by will. The evidence did not establish the testator intended this document to have testamentary effect or to alter/revoke the will. Section 8 of the Succession Act did not apply and probate was granted on the will alone.
Court Disposition
Cross-claim dismissed; probate granted to plaintiffs in solemn form of the 2 May 2008 will.
Orders
- ['Amended cross-claim dismissed.' 'Grant of probate to plaintiffs in solemn form of the will dated 2 May 2008.' 'Plaintiffs to prepare minutes of order by 4pm 5 August 2011.' 'Liberty to apply on costs if not agreed by 4pm 5 August 2011.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment