R v Newbury [2012] NSWSC 34
Having regard to the Presser principles and the opinions of Dr Nielssen and Professor Greenberg, assisted by the observations and opinion of Ms Coultas-Roberts, the Court found on the balance of probabilities that the Accused was unfit to be tried for the murder charge.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Charge; Fitness to Be Tried Enquiry / Enquiry Under the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 as to Whether the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried
- Outcome
- The Accused Wayne Patrick Newbury was found unfit to be tried for the offence of murder and the matter was referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- ['fitness to Plead or Be Tried' 'murder' 'schizophrenia' 'poly Substance Abuse' 'referral to Mental Health Review Tribunal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Charge; Fitness to Be Tried Enquiry / Enquiry Under the Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 as to Whether the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Wayne Patrick Newbury was unfit to be tried for the offence of murder.' 'Whether the matter should be referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal under s 14 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the Presser principles and the opinions of Dr Nielssen and Professor Greenberg, assisted by the observations and opinion of Ms Coultas-Roberts, the Court found on the balance of probabilities that the Accused was unfit to be tried for the murder charge.
Court Disposition
The Accused Wayne Patrick Newbury was found unfit to be tried for the offence of murder and the matter was referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.
Orders
- ['I find that the Accused Wayne Patrick Newbury is unfit to be tried for the offence of the murder of Ross Andrew Tekampe on 3 August 2010.' 'In accordance with s 14 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, I refer this matter to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.' 'Pursuant to s 14(b)(iii) of that Act,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment