Mack v R [2022] NSWCCA 114
Although error was identified regarding double-counting of an offence, the sentencing discretion was re-exercised. The appropriate sentences, upon consideration of all circumstances and the evidence of the applicant's mental health, were found to be the same as those imposed by the sentencing judge. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed after granting leave
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'supply Prohibited Drug' 'possess Unauthorised Prohibited Firearm' 'possess More Than Three Unregistered Firearms' 'sentencing Error' 'mental Health and Sentencing' 'objective Seriousness' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing judge erred by sentencing the applicant twice for the same offence' "Whether sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account applicant's mental health status" 'Whether sentencing judge erred in assessing objective seriousness' 'Whether sentence was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
Although error was identified regarding double-counting of an offence, the sentencing discretion was re-exercised. The appropriate sentences, upon consideration of all circumstances and the evidence of the applicant's mental health, were found to be the same as those imposed by the sentencing judge. Therefore, leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed after granting leave
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal against sentence.' 'Dismiss the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment