Rossiter v Core Mining Limited [2014] NSWSC 969
Given the centrality of witness credibility, the head-on clash of evidence, and the extensive factual issues to be resolved, taking evidence by audiovisual link would significantly impede the Court's ability to assess the witness. The applicants have not shown it is in the interests of justice to permit the evidence by audiovisual link.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['audiovisual Link Evidence' 'witness Credibility' 'cross Examination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to allow evidence to be taken by audiovisual link where credit of witness is a key issue' "Whether sufficient explanation was provided for the witness's inability to attend in person" 'Whether the case is substantially documentary or significantly reliant on witness credibility']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the centrality of witness credibility, the head-on clash of evidence, and the extensive factual issues to be resolved, taking evidence by audiovisual link would significantly impede the Court's ability to assess the witness. The applicants have not shown it is in the interests of justice to permit the evidence by audiovisual link.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Dismiss the notice of motion filed in court on 16 July 2014 with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment