Wazrin Pty Ltd v Pearson [2009] NSWLEC 1420
There is insufficient evidence to order removal of the tree as the whole is unlikely to fail, but risk of injury from falling dead fronds overhanging a main pedestrian entrance satisfies s 10(2), justifying orders for removal of dead fronds instead of the whole tree.
- Parties
- Applicant: Wazrin Pty Ltd; Respondent: Stuart Pearson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Partially granted: tree removal refused; specific remediation ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Damage to Property, Personal Injury Risk
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wazrin Pty Ltd
Applicant
Stuart Pearson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the palm tree has caused or is likely to cause damage to property or risk of injury to persons under s 10(2) of the Act.
- 2 Whether the tree should be removed due to damage or risk of injury.
- 3 Whether the Court has jurisdiction given the uncertainty of ownership of the retaining wall.
Ratio Decidendi
There is insufficient evidence to order removal of the tree as the whole is unlikely to fail, but risk of injury from falling dead fronds overhanging a main pedestrian entrance satisfies s 10(2), justifying orders for removal of dead fronds instead of the whole tree.
Court Disposition
Partially granted: tree removal refused; specific remediation ordered.
Orders
- Application to remove the tree is dismissed.
- Respondent to engage and pay for AQF 3 level arborist to remove dead fronds from the palm, in accordance with AS4373:2007, within 30 days and then annually.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment