WC v R [2008] NSWCCA 75
The Newcastle sentences should be adjusted in their commencement dates to follow the expiration of the aggregate non-parole period of the Port Macquarie sentences, as the partial accumulation of sentences was based on the original, now quashed Port Macquarie sentences, and the Crown does not dispute the adjustment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Sentences quashed and applicant re-sentenced.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Adjustment' 'principle of Totality']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the commencement dates of the Newcastle sentences should be uniformly adjusted to align with the expiration of the aggregate non-parole period of the Port Macquarie sentences as re-imposed on appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The Newcastle sentences should be adjusted in their commencement dates to follow the expiration of the aggregate non-parole period of the Port Macquarie sentences, as the partial accumulation of sentences was based on the original, now quashed Port Macquarie sentences, and the Crown does not dispute the adjustment.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Sentences quashed and applicant re-sentenced.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be granted.' 'The sentences passed by Judge Taylor on 3 November 2006 be quashed.' 'Applicant be sentenced as follows: counts 1 and 2 - imprisonment for a fixed term of 9 months commencing 2 June 2011 and expiring 1 March 2012; counts 3 and 4 - 9 months commencing 2 July 2011 and expiring 1 April...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment