Meng v Pan [2006] NSWSC 774

Meng v Pan [2006] NSWSC 774

The plaintiff, as a shareholder of the company owning the land, does not have a caveatable interest in the property and is not entitled to leave to lodge a further caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Lodge Further Caveat / Ex Parte Hearing in Equity Division
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['caveats' 'caveatable Interest' 'shareholder Interest in Company Owning Land']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Lodge Further Caveat / Ex Parte Hearing in Equity Division

  1. 1 ['Whether a shareholder of a company which owns land has a caveatable interest in the land' 'Whether leave should be granted to lodge a further caveat in breach of s 74O Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, as a shareholder of the company owning the land, does not have a caveatable interest in the property and is not entitled to leave to lodge a further caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['Summons dismissed']