Meng v Pan [2006] NSWSC 774
The plaintiff, as a shareholder of the company owning the land, does not have a caveatable interest in the property and is not entitled to leave to lodge a further caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Lodge Further Caveat / Ex Parte Hearing in Equity Division
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['caveats' 'caveatable Interest' 'shareholder Interest in Company Owning Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Lodge Further Caveat / Ex Parte Hearing in Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a shareholder of a company which owns land has a caveatable interest in the land' 'Whether leave should be granted to lodge a further caveat in breach of s 74O Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff, as a shareholder of the company owning the land, does not have a caveatable interest in the property and is not entitled to leave to lodge a further caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- ['Summons dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment