Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1022

Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1022

The Tribunal did not fail to consider a material imputed political opinion issue because the alleged third issue was not a real issue arising for determination, and the material relied on concerned either the applicant's support for the Hsin Tang party or his inability to have Mr Fang brought to justice because of Mr Fang's connections. The Tribunal was entitled to first consider whether the asserted fear was for a Convention reason and did not err in refusing the longer adjournment or further inquiries, particularly given s420(1) and the limited utility of the proposed additional material.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order to Review a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal Under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Federal Court Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision; Application Dismissed
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion' 'imputed Political Opinion' 'convention Reason' 'failure to Conduct Further Inquiries']
['migration Law' 'refugee Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion' 'imputed Political Opinion' 'convention Reason' 'failure to Conduct Further Inquiries']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for an Order to Review a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal Under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Federal Court Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision; Application Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to give genuine consideration to whether the applicant had a well founded fear of persecution by virtue of being imputed with an adverse political opinion arising from knowledge of corrupt activities connected to a high ranking Taiwanese official.' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to properly consider whether the applicant had a prospective well founded fear of persecution if returned to Taiwan.' "Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred by failing to conduct further inquiries or grant the longer adjournment sought by the applicant's solicitors."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not fail to consider a material imputed political opinion issue because the alleged third issue was not a real issue arising for determination, and the material relied on concerned either the applicant's support for the Hsin Tang party or his inability to have Mr Fang brought to justice because of Mr Fang's connections. The Tribunal was entitled to first consider whether the asserted fear was for a Convention reason and did not err in refusing the longer adjournment or further inquiries, particularly given s420(1) and the limited utility of the proposed additional material.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the respondents costs, including reserved costs, if any.']