Welcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc (No 2) [2001] FCA 785

Welcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc (No 2) [2001] FCA 785

The applicant established infringement of Australian Patent 712925 by the respondents' CiT Transcard and Catuity systems and devices, entitling it to declarations, a general injunction restraining further infringement, delivery up of infringing devices (not software or items capable of non-infringing use), a declaration of entitlement to damages or account of profits (to be elected), and costs payable forthwith. The cross-claim for invalidity was dismissed as the validity of each claim was questioned and not established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Infringement Claim and Cross Claim for Invalidity / Final Orders After Trial
Outcome
Declarations of infringement made. Injunction granted restraining infringement. Delivery up of infringing devices ordered. Applicant entitled to damages or account of profits (to be elected). Cross-claim dismissed. Respondents to pay applicant's costs forthwith.
Legal Topics
['patent Infringement' 'remedies' 'injunction' 'damages or Account of Profits' 'delivery Up' 'costs']
['intellectual Property' 'patents'] ['patent Infringement' 'remedies' 'injunction' 'damages or Account of Profits' 'delivery Up' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Infringement Claim and Cross Claim for Invalidity / Final Orders After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondents infringed the claims of Australian Patent 712925' 'Appropriate scope and form of injunction for patent infringement' 'Whether delivery up should be ordered for products/devices/software' 'Entitlement to damages or account of profits' 'Validity of cross-claim for invalidity' 'Appropriate costs order']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established infringement of Australian Patent 712925 by the respondents' CiT Transcard and Catuity systems and devices, entitling it to declarations, a general injunction restraining further infringement, delivery up of infringing devices (not software or items capable of non-infringing use), a declaration of entitlement to damages or account of profits (to be elected), and costs payable forthwith. The cross-claim for invalidity was dismissed as the validity of each claim was questioned and not established.

Court Disposition

Declarations of infringement made. Injunction granted restraining infringement. Delivery up of infringing devices ordered. Applicant entitled to damages or account of profits (to be elected). Cross-claim dismissed. Respondents to pay applicant's costs forthwith.

Orders

  • ["Declarations that operation and use of CiT Transcard system and Catuity system infringe claims of Australian Patent 712925, with respondents' liability dates specified." 'Injunction restraining each respondent from infringing the Patent in Australia during its term; for CiT Transcard system and device, restraint...