Atkins v Cooper [2008] NSWSC 1077

Atkins v Cooper [2008] NSWSC 1077

Given that the plaintiff has principally had custody and management of the dog since 2004 and considering the balance of convenience, the dog should be restored to the plaintiff's custody and the defendants restrained from removing her until further court order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted
Legal Topics
['equitable Remedies' 'injunctions' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'balance of Convenience']
['equity'] ['equitable Remedies' 'injunctions' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'balance of Convenience']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restore possession of a dog to the plaintiff pending trial determination of ownership.']

Ratio Decidendi

Given that the plaintiff has principally had custody and management of the dog since 2004 and considering the balance of convenience, the dog should be restored to the plaintiff's custody and the defendants restrained from removing her until further court order.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • ['The dog is to be returned forthwith to the custody of the plaintiff.' "The defendants are restrained from removing the dog from the plaintiff's custody until further order of the Court."]