Wendy Maria Jarasius v. Forestry Commission Of New South Wales [1988] NSWLEC 164
The Court declined to make declarations due to the danger of conflicts with future litigation and accepted undertakings from the first respondent as adequate to give effect to the judgment. Costs were ordered to be substantially paid by the first and second respondents (80%), considering interlocutory proceedings and unnecessary costs incurred.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Declarations declined; undertakings accepted; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['forestry' 'injunctions' 'cost Orders' 'declarations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether declarations should be made regarding subject licences and works in forest areas' 'Applicability and effect of undertakings offered by the first respondent' 'Allocation of costs among the parties']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to make declarations due to the danger of conflicts with future litigation and accepted undertakings from the first respondent as adequate to give effect to the judgment. Costs were ordered to be substantially paid by the first and second respondents (80%), considering interlocutory proceedings and unnecessary costs incurred.
Court Disposition
Declarations declined; undertakings accepted; costs orders made.
Orders
- ['Undertakings 1, 2, and 3 (as amended and referring to exhibit "A") accepted from first respondent.' 'Liberty to apply granted.' 'Order that exhibits may be released, except exhibits "A" and "19A".' 'First and second respondents to pay eighty per cent of the costs of the applicant in these proceedings.' 'No order...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment