ROGERS v WENTWORTH [1994] NSWCA 267
The primary question of whether leave should be granted to appeal the costs order is reserved pending further developments on unresolved matters (notably the malicious prosecution action and associated costs), and the court is not able to finally dispose of all outstanding issues until these matters have been clarified or determined.
- Parties
- Claimant: Rogers; Respondent: Wentworth; Mr S Russo
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Appeal From Costs Order; Some Costs and Interest Issues Dealt With, Substantive Matters Outstanding)
- Outcome
- Orders accordingly; application for extension of time and leave to appeal considered, some issues reserved awaiting further action or clarification.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Costs Orders, Interest on Judgment, Procedure Following Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rogers
Claimant
Wentworth
Respondent
Mr S Russo
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Interlocutory (application for Leave to Appeal From Costs Order; Some Costs and Interest Issues Dealt With, Substantive Matters Outstanding)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against an order for costs under s 101(2)(c)
- 2 Whether order for costs and interest made by Sully J was correct
- 3 Whether the Court of Appeal has authority to determine costs of previous (Maxwell J) trial
Ratio Decidendi
The primary question of whether leave should be granted to appeal the costs order is reserved pending further developments on unresolved matters (notably the malicious prosecution action and associated costs), and the court is not able to finally dispose of all outstanding issues until these matters have been clarified or determined.
Court Disposition
Orders accordingly; application for extension of time and leave to appeal considered, some issues reserved awaiting further action or clarification.
Orders
- Extension of time consented to by respondent
- Leave to appeal argued but not finally resolved pending outstanding matters
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment