Wentworth Park Sporting Complex Trust v Leichhardt Council [2002] NSWLEC 152
The subject land was not land owned by the Crown because the 1878 dedication in perpetuity of Wentworth Park as a park or place of public recreation vested its beneficial use and enjoyment in the public and no legislation had discharged that dedication. The Applicant was nevertheless an owner for rating purposes because it received rents and profits as trustee and had an estate under Crown Lands Act 1989, s 100. In any event, assuming Crown ownership, the dominant use of the land under licences for greyhound racing meant the land was held under a lease for private purposes. The exemption in Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a) was therefore not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Pursuant to Local Government Act 1993, S 574 Against Rates and Charges Notices / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; the subject land is not exempt from rates under Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a).
- Legal Topics
- ['exemption From Rates' 'land Owned by the Crown' 'lease for Private Purposes' 'reserve Trusts' 'wentworth Park Greyhound Racing Complex']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Pursuant to Local Government Act 1993, S 574 Against Rates and Charges Notices / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subject land was relevantly land owned by the Crown within the meaning of Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a).' 'If the subject land was owned by the Crown, whether it was not held under a lease for private purposes within the meaning of Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a).' 'Whether the Applicant was an owner of the subject land for liability to rates under the Local Government Act 1993.']
Ratio Decidendi
The subject land was not land owned by the Crown because the 1878 dedication in perpetuity of Wentworth Park as a park or place of public recreation vested its beneficial use and enjoyment in the public and no legislation had discharged that dedication. The Applicant was nevertheless an owner for rating purposes because it received rents and profits as trustee and had an estate under Crown Lands Act 1989, s 100. In any event, assuming Crown ownership, the dominant use of the land under licences for greyhound racing meant the land was held under a lease for private purposes. The exemption in Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a) was therefore not established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; the subject land is not exempt from rates under Local Government Act 1993, s 555(1)(a).
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'Exhibits be returned.' 'Question of costs be reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment