Western Australian Planning Commission v Southregal Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 7
On the true construction of ss 173 and 177 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (WA), the right to claim compensation for injurious affection caused by the reservation of land for a public purpose vests solely in the person who was the owner of the land at the date of the reservation. This right is not transferable to a subsequent purchaser, and, where the land has been first sold since reservation, a later refusal of a development application does not give a new compensation entitlement to a new owner.
- Parties
- Appellant: Western Australian Planning Commission; Respondent: Southregal Pty Ltd; Respondent: Mr Wee; Respondent: Trevor Neil Leith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Injurious Affection, Town Planning Schemes, Statutory Construction, Entitlement to Compensation, Temporal Scope of Compensation Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Western Australian Planning Commission
Appellant
Southregal Pty Ltd
Respondent
Mr Wee
Respondent
Trevor Neil Leith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether purchasers of land reserved for public purposes after the date of reservation are entitled to compensation under the Planning and Development Act 2005 (WA) upon refusal of development approval under s 177(1)(b), or whether compensation is only available to the owner at the date of reservation.
Ratio Decidendi
On the true construction of ss 173 and 177 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (WA), the right to claim compensation for injurious affection caused by the reservation of land for a public purpose vests solely in the person who was the owner of the land at the date of the reservation. This right is not transferable to a subsequent purchaser, and, where the land has been first sold since reservation, a later refusal of a development application does not give a new compensation entitlement to a new owner.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed in both matters.
- Orders (a) and (b) of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia dated 24 March 2016 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment