Electricity Networks Corporation v Herridge PartiesCitation:[2022] HCA 37Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Gordon, Edelman, Steward JJDate:07 Dec 2022Case Number:P5/2022Read more
Western Power owed a duty of care to persons in the vicinity of the electricity distribution system to take reasonable care to avoid or minimise the risk of injury and property damage from fire ignition and spread, as the imposition of such a duty was not inconsistent with the statutory framework.
- Parties
- Appellant: Western Power; Fourth Respondent: Mrs Campbell; Fifth Respondent: Thiess
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Electricity Distribution, Statutory Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Western Power
Appellant
Mrs Campbell
Fourth Respondent
Thiess
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Western Power owed a duty of care to persons in the vicinity of the electricity distribution system to take reasonable care to avoid or minimise risk of injury and property damage from fire ignition and spread in connection with electricity delivery.
Ratio Decidendi
Western Power owed a duty of care to persons in the vicinity of the electricity distribution system to take reasonable care to avoid or minimise the risk of injury and property damage from fire ignition and spread, as the imposition of such a duty was not inconsistent with the statutory framework.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Western Power found to owe a duty of care in negligence.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment