Westfield Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 1333
The conditions of consent may be modified to allow controlled access and the introduction of parking fees for both visitors and staff, subject to limitations ensuring fees do not act as a disincentive to on-site parking and do not cause displacement into surrounding streets. Three hours free visitor parking and four hours free staff parking are required before any fee is charged to mitigate adverse amenity impacts and meet planning objectives; regulated fee amounts are not required, provided the minimum free periods are observed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeals (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Judgment After Hearing of Three Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeals upheld; development consents and modifications approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conditions of Consent' 'parking Management' 'modification of Consent' 'environmental Impact' 'social and Economic Impact' 'public Transport Policy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeals (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Judgment After Hearing of Three Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether consent conditions can be modified to allow controlled access and fees for parking at Westfield Miranda' 'Social and economic impacts of introducing paid parking on locality, staff, and residents' 'Whether required parking allocations for staff prevent adverse off-site impacts' 'Scope of consent authority to regulate parking fee levels']
Ratio Decidendi
The conditions of consent may be modified to allow controlled access and the introduction of parking fees for both visitors and staff, subject to limitations ensuring fees do not act as a disincentive to on-site parking and do not cause displacement into surrounding streets. Three hours free visitor parking and four hours free staff parking are required before any fee is charged to mitigate adverse amenity impacts and meet planning objectives; regulated fee amounts are not required, provided the minimum free periods are observed.
Court Disposition
Appeals upheld; development consents and modifications approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Parties to file Short Minutes of Order reflecting the judgment by 24 November 2011.' '900 staff parking spaces to be provided.' 'No fee for visitor parking for first three hours.' 'No fee for staff parking for first four hours.' 'Surveys of staff and street parking before and after fee introduction to determine...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment