Westpac Banking Corporation v Victor Warren Ollis & Ors [2007] NSWSC 1008
The defendants, knowing of Mr Ollis's dishonesty and having defended the proceedings despite overwhelming evidence, constituted relevant delinquency justifying an order for indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Post Judgment (costs and Final Orders)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff; indemnity costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'dishonesty' 'property Transfer Without Consideration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Post Judgment (costs and Final Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be ordered against the defendants' 'Whether the conduct of the defendants constituted relevant delinquency justifying indemnity costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants, knowing of Mr Ollis's dishonesty and having defended the proceedings despite overwhelming evidence, constituted relevant delinquency justifying an order for indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff; indemnity costs ordered.
Orders
- ['Declarations in terms of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Order dated 6 September 2007.' 'Judgment entered against the first defendant in favour of the plaintiff in the amount of $14,813,160.83.' 'Proceedings stood over to the Commercial List for further directions on 7 December 2007.' "Defendants ordered to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment