Westpac Banking Corporation v Earthwise International Limited & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1037
Where a mingled trust fund is insufficient to satisfy all beneficiaries' entitlements in full, distribution must be made pro rata according to the amounts contributed by each beneficiary, regardless of tracing difficulties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Interpleader Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made for payment out of fund to new trustee and pro rata distribution amongst beneficiaries; Investors' costs to be paid out of the fund.
- Legal Topics
- ['mingled Fund' 'distribution of Trust Funds' 'breach of Trust' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interpleader Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Upon what principle should a mingled trust fund with insufficient assets to repay all beneficiaries be distributed?' "Should the Investors' costs be paid out of the trust fund?"]
Ratio Decidendi
Where a mingled trust fund is insufficient to satisfy all beneficiaries' entitlements in full, distribution must be made pro rata according to the amounts contributed by each beneficiary, regardless of tracing difficulties.
Court Disposition
Orders made for payment out of fund to new trustee and pro rata distribution amongst beneficiaries; Investors' costs to be paid out of the fund.
Orders
- ['Declaration made in terms of Short Minutes of Order (paragraph 1)' 'Directions in paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Short Minutes of Order' 'Order in terms of paragraph 3 of Short Minutes of Order' 'Costs to be assessed and paid out of the fund' "Matter stood into Registrar's list on 3 April 2006"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment