Westpac Banking Corporation v Southern Environmental Services [2017] NSWSC 330
The notice to produce was set aside because there was no legitimate forensic purpose for requiring the production of Klondu's financial records: there was no claim for Klondu’s profits, the information was too remote from Environmental’s pleaded claim for lost hiring profits, and Environmental had already particularised its loss in the cross-claim.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Westpac Banking Corporation; First Defendant/cross Claimant: Southern Environmental Services Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Gyressa Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Paul Thomas Cambage Wenham; First Cross Defendant: Gloucester 103 Holdings Pty Ltd; Second Cross Defendant: Klondu Group Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce
- Outcome
- Notice to produce set aside; costs to second cross-defendant
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Forensic Purpose, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westpac Banking Corporation
Plaintiff
Southern Environmental Services Pty Ltd
First Defendant/cross Claimant
Gyressa Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Paul Thomas Cambage Wenham
Third Defendant
Gloucester 103 Holdings Pty Ltd
First Cross Defendant
Klondu Group Pty Limited
Second Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice to produce issued by the defendants/cross-claimant to the second cross-defendant had a legitimate forensic purpose
Ratio Decidendi
The notice to produce was set aside because there was no legitimate forensic purpose for requiring the production of Klondu's financial records: there was no claim for Klondu’s profits, the information was too remote from Environmental’s pleaded claim for lost hiring profits, and Environmental had already particularised its loss in the cross-claim.
Court Disposition
Notice to produce set aside; costs to second cross-defendant
Orders
- The notice to produce issued by the defendants/cross-claimant to the second cross-defendant dated 9 December 2016 is set aside.
- The defendants/cross-claimant must pay the costs of the second cross-defendant of the notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment