Westpac Banking Corporation v Ageletopoulos Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1039
Defences that amount to a general denial without disclosing material facts or notifying the case the Plaintiff has to meet are impermissible and must be struck out, with liberty granted to Defendants to re-plead properly within a specified timeframe.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Westpac Banking Corporation; First Defendant: Ageletopoulos Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Theo Poulos; Third Defendant: Maria Poulos; Fourth Defendant: Peter Poulos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Proceedings and Monetary Claim / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Pleadings
- Outcome
- Defences filed by the Defendants on 4 July 2013 struck out; liberty to re-plead granted.
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Strike Out of Defences, Possession List, Guarantees, Loan Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westpac Banking Corporation
Plaintiff
Ageletopoulos Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Theo Poulos
Second Defendant
Maria Poulos
Third Defendant
Peter Poulos
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Possession Proceedings and Monetary Claim / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the filed defences disclose a proper defence or merely amount to a plea of the general issue
- 2 Whether the defences should be struck out with liberty to re-plead
Ratio Decidendi
Defences that amount to a general denial without disclosing material facts or notifying the case the Plaintiff has to meet are impermissible and must be struck out, with liberty granted to Defendants to re-plead properly within a specified timeframe.
Court Disposition
Defences filed by the Defendants on 4 July 2013 struck out; liberty to re-plead granted.
Orders
- Each of the defences filed by the Defendants on 4 July 2013 is struck out.
- Amended Defences and any cross-claims are to be filed and served by close of business on 19 August 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment