Whirlpool (Australia) Pty Ltd v Discount Electrical Centre (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 912
Absent consent to the proposed amendment, a new cause of action arising after the date of the original application cannot be pleaded by amendment; a new application must be filed to enable such a claim to be made.
- Parties
- Applicant: Whirlpool (Australia) Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Discount Electrical Centre (Australia) Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Steven Tattos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory Application – Application to Amend
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, New Cause of Action, Federal Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Whirlpool (Australia) Pty Ltd
Applicant
Discount Electrical Centre (Australia) Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Steven Tattos
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory Application – Application to Amend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend the statement of claim to introduce a new cause of action arising after commencement of proceedings
- 2 Whether a new application is required to plead such a new cause of action in the Federal Court
Ratio Decidendi
Absent consent to the proposed amendment, a new cause of action arising after the date of the original application cannot be pleaded by amendment; a new application must be filed to enable such a claim to be made.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's motion be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment