Whiteway House (No.348) Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC 1350

Whiteway House (No.348) Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC 1350

The proposed modifications result in a development substantially the same as approved; the parties' agreement is permissible for approval under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979; and the Court must give effect to that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the modification application with amended conditions.

Parties
Applicant: Whiteway House (No.348) Pty Ltd; Respondent: Waverley Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Judgment After Conciliation Conference
Outcome
Appeal upheld; modification application approved with amended conditions
Legal Topics
Modification Application, Development Consent, Conciliation Conference, Jurisdictional Prerequisites

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Whiteway House (No.348) Pty Ltd

Applicant

Waverley Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Appeal / Judgment After Conciliation Conference

  1. 1 Whether the modification application results in a development substantially the same as originally approved
  2. 2 Whether the Court can dispose of proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed modifications result in a development substantially the same as approved; the parties' agreement is permissible for approval under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979; and the Court must give effect to that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the modification application with amended conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; modification application approved with amended conditions

Orders

  • The Applicant is granted leave to amend the modification application to rely upon the amended architectural plans and landscape plans referred to in condition 1(a) and (b) of Annexure A.
  • The Appeal is upheld.