Widjabul Wia-Bal v Attorney-General of New South Wales (Section 87 Agreement) [2022] FCA 1521
The majority of living, capable members of the applicant can continue to act and seek a consent determination; the Court's power to make a native title determination under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is not limited by the description of the claim group in Form 1, and the consent determination can appropriately include a broader or amended group if properly authorised in accordance with the Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Widjabul Wia-bal; First Respondent: Attorney-General of New South Wales; Second Respondent: Byron Shire Council; Third Respondent: Lismore City Council; Fourth Respondent: Jali Local Aboriginal Land Council; Fifth Respondent: New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council; Ninth Respondent: Ngulingah Local Aboriginal Land Council; Sixth Respondent: NTSCORP Limited; Seventh Respondent: Telstra Corporation Limited; Eighth Respondent: Transgrid; Tenth Respondent: Amplitel Pty Ltd as trustee of the Towers Business Operating Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Native Title Determination / Final Determination With Orders Made by Consent Under S 87 Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
- Outcome
- Consent native title determination orders made. Native title found to exist in specified areas, extinguished in others. Determination is to commence upon registration of the ILUA, with listing for case management if not registered by prescribed date. Corporation appointed as trust holder of native title. No order as...
- Legal Topics
- Consent Determination, Group Membership Definition, Death/incapacity of Applicant, Court Powers—description in Form 1
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Widjabul Wia-bal
Applicant
Attorney-General of New South Wales
First Respondent
Byron Shire Council
Second Respondent
Lismore City Council
Third Respondent
Jali Local Aboriginal Land Council
Fourth Respondent
New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council
Fifth Respondent
Ngulingah Local Aboriginal Land Council
Ninth Respondent
NTSCORP Limited
Sixth Respondent
Telstra Corporation Limited
Seventh Respondent
Transgrid
Eighth Respondent
Amplitel Pty Ltd as trustee of the Towers Business Operating Trust
Tenth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Native Title Determination / Final Determination With Orders Made by Consent Under S 87 Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant's authorisation lapses or is invalidated due to death or incapacity of applicant members
- 2 Whether the Court can make consent determination under s 87 where claim group description differs from Form 1
- 3 Requirements for sufficient authorisation under Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The majority of living, capable members of the applicant can continue to act and seek a consent determination; the Court's power to make a native title determination under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is not limited by the description of the claim group in Form 1, and the consent determination can appropriately include a broader or amended group if properly authorised in accordance with the Act.
Court Disposition
Consent native title determination orders made. Native title found to exist in specified areas, extinguished in others. Determination is to commence upon registration of the ILUA, with listing for case management if not registered by prescribed date. Corporation appointed as trust holder of native title. No order as...
Orders
- Determination of native title in terms sought by the parties.
- Orders take effect upon registration of the ILUA; if not registered by 18 December 2025, matter to be listed for case management.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment