Bosanac v Commissioner of TaxationCitation:[2022] HCA 34Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson JJDate:12 Oct 2022Case Number:P9/2022Read more

Bosanac v Commissioner of TaxationCitation:[2022] HCA 34Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson JJDate:12 Oct 2022Case Number:P9/2022Read more

The presumption of advancement applied and precluded the presumption of resulting trust from arising in favour of the husband; the objective intention, as evidenced by the registration of title and history of separate ownership, was that the wife was to be the sole beneficial owner.

Parties
Plaintiff: Wife; Defendant: Husband
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Resulting Trust, Presumption of Advancement, Matrimonial Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wife

Plaintiff

Husband

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the presumption of resulting trust arises in favour of the husband over one half of the property
  2. 2 Whether the presumption of advancement precludes the presumption of resulting trust
  3. 3 Whether the objective intention was for the husband to have a beneficial interest in the property

Ratio Decidendi

The presumption of advancement applied and precluded the presumption of resulting trust from arising in favour of the husband; the objective intention, as evidenced by the registration of title and history of separate ownership, was that the wife was to be the sole beneficial owner.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • No beneficial interest in favour of the husband
  • Wife remains sole owner of the property