WILDRIDGE AND SINCLAIR ENGINEERING PTY LTD v LAW [1994] NSWCA 348
Following Arklow Pty Ltd v Taavao and the General Agreement on Interest, interest should only be awarded on the pre-award portion of a lump sum for pain and suffering under s67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The award must be apportioned between pre- and post-award pain and suffering, and the appropriate interest rates are 14% (27 May 1988–31 Dec 1988), 12% (1 Jan 1989–31 Dec 1990), and 8% (1 Jan 1991–21 Feb 1992) on the pre-award portion. The rate of 18% awarded below was excessive.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wildridge and Sinclair Engineering Pty Ltd; Respondent: Law
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation Appeal / Appeal Supreme Court of NSW Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; orders of Burke CCJ varied.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Compensation Awards, Lump Sum Compensation, Apportionment of Pain and Suffering, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wildridge and Sinclair Engineering Pty Ltd
Appellant
Law
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation Appeal / Appeal Supreme Court of NSW Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interest on a lump sum award for pain and suffering under s67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 should be apportioned between pre- and post-award periods.
- 2 Whether only the amount representing pre-award pain and suffering should carry interest.
- 3 Whether the rate of interest awarded was excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
Following Arklow Pty Ltd v Taavao and the General Agreement on Interest, interest should only be awarded on the pre-award portion of a lump sum for pain and suffering under s67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The award must be apportioned between pre- and post-award pain and suffering, and the appropriate interest rates are 14% (27 May 1988–31 Dec 1988), 12% (1 Jan 1989–31 Dec 1990), and 8% (1 Jan 1991–21 Feb 1992) on the pre-award portion. The rate of 18% awarded below was excessive.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; orders of Burke CCJ varied.
Orders
- Para (B) of original award deleted and replaced with: A lump sum of $20,000 under s67 apportioned as $10,000 pre-award and $10,000 post-award.
- Para (D) of original award set aside and replaced with: Interest on $10,000 pre-award portion—14% p.a. from 27 May 1988 to 31 Dec 1988; 12% p.a. from 1 Jan 1989 to 31 Dec 1990; 8% p.a. from 1 Jan 1991 to 21 Feb 1992.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment