Leung v Alexakis (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAP 78
Although both parties had some success on different issues, the respondent was predominantly successful as the appellants' main claim failed; thus the respondent is entitled to 75% of the costs of the appeal, to be agreed or assessed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wilfred Leung; Appellant: Sio Hung Lo; Respondent: Angela Alexakis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Orders on Appeal
- Outcome
- Partial award of costs to respondent
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Discretion to Award Costs, Home Building Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilfred Leung
Appellant
Sio Hung Lo
Appellant
Angela Alexakis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Orders on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to a costs order against the appellants for the appeal
- 2 Whether extension of time for lodging a costs application should be granted
- 3 How the discretion to award costs should be exercised under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act and related rules
Ratio Decidendi
Although both parties had some success on different issues, the respondent was predominantly successful as the appellants' main claim failed; thus the respondent is entitled to 75% of the costs of the appeal, to be agreed or assessed.
Court Disposition
Partial award of costs to respondent
Orders
- A hearing of the respondent's costs application is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
- Time for respondent to lodge application for costs extended to 22 January 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment