WILLCOCKS v NEW BROKEN HILL CONSOLIDATED LTD [1989] NSWCA 233
The trial judge erred by failing to consider the applicant's pre-injury mining earnings as the required starting point under s11(1)(a) in calculating compensation for partial incapacity. Voluntary retirement does not automatically remove mining earnings from the assessment, and the matter must be remitted for proper determination.
- Parties
- Appellant: Willcocks; Respondent: New Broken Hill Consolidated Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Partial Incapacity, Assessment of Compensation, Calculation Under S11(1)(a), Voluntary Retirement and Economic Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Willcocks
Appellant
New Broken Hill Consolidated Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in applying s11(1)(a) of the Workers' Compensation Act 1926 by failing to consider pre-injury mining earnings in assessing compensation for partial incapacity where the worker retired voluntarily.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred by failing to consider the applicant's pre-injury mining earnings as the required starting point under s11(1)(a) in calculating compensation for partial incapacity. Voluntary retirement does not automatically remove mining earnings from the assessment, and the matter must be remitted for proper determination.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Award of McGrath J dated 23 June 1988 set aside
- Proceedings returned to Compensation Court of New South Wales for redetermination in accordance with appellate judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment