Gutheil v Ballarat Trustees Executors and Agency Company Limited [1922] HCA 19
The words 'my next of kin' in the testator's will, given the structure and context of the will and the expressed intention to exclude certain persons, are to be construed as 'my nearest blood relations at my death other than my son and my two sisters'. Including the son would render the clause nugatory, as he would already have taken under previous provisions. Thus, the will intends to exclude the son from the class of 'next of kin' in clause 6(c).
- Parties
- Appellant; Widow; Beneficiary: Margaret Edith Lyell Gutheil; Respondent; Trustee; Plaintiff: The Ballarat Trustees, Executors and Agency Company Limited; Respondent; Trustee; Plaintiff: Thomas Ryan Jones; Respondent; Public Trustee: Reginald Hayes
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Will Construction, Gift Over, Meaning of 'next of Kin'
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Edith Lyell Gutheil
Appellant; Widow; Beneficiary
The Ballarat Trustees, Executors and Agency Company Limited
Respondent; Trustee; Plaintiff
Thomas Ryan Jones
Respondent; Trustee; Plaintiff
Reginald Hayes
Respondent; Public Trustee
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of a will's residuary clause: does 'my next of kin save and except my two sisters' include the testator's deceased son?
- 2 Does the will intend to exclude the son from the class of 'next of kin'?
- 3 At what time should 'next of kin' be ascertained for the purpose of the will?
Ratio Decidendi
The words 'my next of kin' in the testator's will, given the structure and context of the will and the expressed intention to exclude certain persons, are to be construed as 'my nearest blood relations at my death other than my son and my two sisters'. Including the son would render the clause nugatory, as he would already have taken under previous provisions. Thus, the will intends to exclude the son from the class of 'next of kin' in clause 6(c).
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs of all parties to be paid out of the estate; those of the trustees as between solicitor and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment