Donnelly v Donnelly [1939] HCA 16
Based on the findings of fact, the husband's behaviour—including an illicit infatuation with a sixteen-year-old girl, lack of support for his wife, gambling, drinking, an attempt to have sexual relations with the girl, and a proposal that wife and girl live with him as wives—was such that a self-respecting woman would be morally coerced into withdrawing from the matrimonial relationship, amounting to constructive desertion.
- Parties
- Appellant/petitioner: Violet Olive Donnelly; Respondent: William Donnelly
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside. Decree nisi granted.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Desertion, Constructive Desertion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Violet Olive Donnelly
Appellant/petitioner
William Donnelly
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct of the husband constituted constructive desertion under section 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.).
Ratio Decidendi
Based on the findings of fact, the husband's behaviour—including an illicit infatuation with a sixteen-year-old girl, lack of support for his wife, gambling, drinking, an attempt to have sexual relations with the girl, and a proposal that wife and girl live with him as wives—was such that a self-respecting woman would be morally coerced into withdrawing from the matrimonial relationship, amounting to constructive desertion.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside. Decree nisi granted.
Orders
- Order of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside
- Decree nisi granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment