Bamber v Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 248
It was more likely than not that the excessive tautness of the hauling rope, a safety defect, was present when the ladder was supplied and had a causal connection with Mr Bamber's injury. Mr Bamber’s omission in ensuring the locking mechanism was fully engaged also contributed to the injury. Damages were reduced by 30% for contributory negligence. The primary judge’s adverse credit findings were open on the evidence, but erred in directing a verdict for the respondent.
- Parties
- Appellant: William Duncan Bamber; Respondent: Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Product Liability, Defective Goods, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Duncan Bamber
Appellant
Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ladder had safety defect when supplied by Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd
- 2 Whether safety defect caused appellant's injury
- 3 Whether appellant contributorily negligent
Ratio Decidendi
It was more likely than not that the excessive tautness of the hauling rope, a safety defect, was present when the ladder was supplied and had a causal connection with Mr Bamber's injury. Mr Bamber’s omission in ensuring the locking mechanism was fully engaged also contributed to the injury. Damages were reduced by 30% for contributory negligence. The primary judge’s adverse credit findings were open on the evidence, but erred in directing a verdict for the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders made by the primary judge set aside
- Damages for Mr William Bamber against Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd in the sum of $73,531.47
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment