Bamber v Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 248

Bamber v Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 248

It was more likely than not that the excessive tautness of the hauling rope, a safety defect, was present when the ladder was supplied and had a causal connection with Mr Bamber's injury. Mr Bamber’s omission in ensuring the locking mechanism was fully engaged also contributed to the injury. Damages were reduced by 30% for contributory negligence. The primary judge’s adverse credit findings were open on the evidence, but erred in directing a verdict for the respondent.

Parties
Appellant: William Duncan Bamber; Respondent: Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Product Liability, Defective Goods, Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Duncan Bamber

Appellant

Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether ladder had safety defect when supplied by Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd
  2. 2 Whether safety defect caused appellant's injury
  3. 3 Whether appellant contributorily negligent

Ratio Decidendi

It was more likely than not that the excessive tautness of the hauling rope, a safety defect, was present when the ladder was supplied and had a causal connection with Mr Bamber's injury. Mr Bamber’s omission in ensuring the locking mechanism was fully engaged also contributed to the injury. Damages were reduced by 30% for contributory negligence. The primary judge’s adverse credit findings were open on the evidence, but erred in directing a verdict for the respondent.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Orders made by the primary judge set aside
  • Damages for Mr William Bamber against Hartman Pacific Pty Ltd in the sum of $73,531.47